A lack of quality control in the graphene market has led to inferior products being touted as high-grade, so now a National University of Singapore research team has developed a reliable way to test graphene quality
Ever since the isolation of graphene was first achieved in 2004, there has been an explosion in graphene-related research and development, with hundreds of business opportunists producing graphene to capitalise on this rapidly expanding industry.
However, a new study by researchers from the National University of Singapore (NUS) has uncovered a major problem — a lack of production standards has led to many cases of poor quality graphene from suppliers. Such practices can impede the progress of research that depend fundamentally on the use of high-quality graphene.
“It is alarming to uncover that producers are labelling black powders as graphene and selling them for top dollar, while in reality, they contain mostly cheap graphite. There is a strong need to set up stringent standards for graphene characterization and production to create a healthy and reliable graphene market worldwide,” says Professor Antonio Castro Neto, Director of the NUS Centre for Advanced 2D Materials, who led the study.
The results of the study were published in the journal Advanced Materials on Sept. 13.
Graphene has been tipped as the miracle material of the future due to its remarkable properties. Despite being the thinnest material on Earth, it is 200 times stronger than steel. At just one atom thick, it is also an incredible electrical conductor, but remains light, flexible, and is transparent.
Therefore, graphene is finding potential applications in everything from transistors to biomedical devices, and has even been proposed as a material for building an elevator to space.
Graphene is typically produced by exfoliating graphite, which can be found in common pencil leads, into a powder, submerging this powder into a liquid, and then separating the tiniest graphene flakes by using sound energy to vibrate the mixture.
The aim of this synthesis is to produce the thinnest graphene possible. Pure graphene would be just one atomic layer thick; however, the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) states that stacks of graphene flakes up to 10 layers thick can still behave like graphene.
With this in mind, Castro Neto and his team set out to develop a systematic and reliable method for establishing the quality of graphene samples from around the world. They were able to achieve this by using a wide range of analytical techniques and tested samples from many suppliers.
Upon analyzing samples from over 60 different providers from the Americas, Asia and Europe, the NUS team discovered that the majority contained less than 10 percent of what can be considered graphene flakes. The bulk of the samples was graphite powder that was not exfoliated properly.
“Whether producers of the counterfeit graphene are aware of the poor quality is unclear. Regardless, the lack of standards for graphene production gives rise to bad quality of the material sold in the open market. This has been stalling the development of the future applications,” says Castro Neto.
Graphite powder and graphene have wildly different properties, so any research conducted under the pretext that the sample was pure graphene would give inaccurate results. In addition, just one of the samples tested in the study contained more than 40 percent of high-quality graphene.
Moreover, some samples were even contaminated with other chemicals used in the production process. These findings mean that researchers could be wasting valuable time and money performing experiments on a product that is falsely advertised.
“This is the first ever study to analyze statistically the world production of graphene flakes. Considering the important challenges related to health, climate, and sustainability that graphene may be able to solve, it is crucial that research is not hindered in this way,” explains Castro Neto.
With this discovery, and the development of a reliable testing procedure, graphene samples may now be held to a higher standard.
“We hope that our results will speed up the process of standardization of graphene within ISO as there is a huge market need for that. This will urge graphene producers worldwide to improve their methods to produce a better, properly characterized product that could help to develop real-world applications,” says Castro Neto.
In addition, testing graphene using a universal and standardized way could ensure easy quantitative comparisons between data produced from different laboratories and users around the world.
Source: National University of Singapore