A new study aimed at refining the way scientists measure ice loss in Greenland is providing a “high-definition picture” of
climate-caused changes on the island.
And the picture isn’t pretty.
In the last decade, two of the largest three glaciers draining that frozen
landscape have lost enough ice that, if melted, could have filled Lake Erie.
The three glaciers—Helheim, Kangerdlugssuaq, and Jakobshavn Isbrae—are
responsible for as much as one-fifth of the ice flowing out from Greenland into the ocean.
“Jakobshavn alone drains somewhere between 15% and 20% of all the ice
flowing outward from inland to the sea,” explained Ian Howat, an assistant
professor of earth sciences at Ohio State Univ. His study appears in Geophysical Research Letters.
As the second largest holder of ice on the planet, and the site of hundreds
of glaciers, Greenland is a natural laboratory
for studying how climate change has affected these ice fields.
Researchers focus on the “mass balance” of glaciers, the rate of new ice
being formed as snow falls versus the flow of ice out into the sea.
The new study suggests that, in the last decade, Jakobshavn Isbrae has lost
enough ice to equal 11 years’ worth of normal snow accumulation, approximately
300 gigatons (300 billion tons) of ice.
“Kangerdlugssuaq would have to stop flowing and accumulate snowfall for
seven years to regain the ice it has lost,” said Howat, also a member of the Byrd Polar Research Center
at Ohio State.
Surprisingly, the researchers found that the third glacier, Helheim, had
actually gained a small amount of mass over the same period. It gained
approximately one-fifteenth of what Jakobshavn had lost, Howat said.
The real value of the research, however, is the confirmation that the new
techniques Howat and his colleagues developed will provide scientists a more
accurate idea of exactly how much ice is being lost.
“These glaciers change pretty quickly. They speed up and then slow down. There’s
a pulsing in the flow of ice,” Howat said. “There’s variability, a seasonal
cycle and lots of different changes in the rate that ice is flowing through
these glaciers.”
Past estimates, he said, have been merely snapshots of what was going on at
these glaciers in terms of mass loss. “We really need to sample them very
frequently or else we won’t really know how much change has occurred.
“This new research pumps up the resolution and gives us a kind of
high-definition picture of ice loss,” he said.
To get this longer-timeframe image, Howat and colleagues drew on data sets
provided by at least seven orbiting satellites and airplanes, as well as other
sources.
“To get a good picture of what’s going on, we need different tools and each
one of these satellites plays an important role and adds more information,”
Howat said.
The next step is to look at the next-largest glaciers in Greenland
and work their way down through smaller and smaller ice flows.
“Currently, the missing piece is ice thickness data for all of the glaciers,
but a NASA aircraft is up there getting it. When that’s available, we’ll be
able to apply this technique to the entire Greenland
ice sheet and get a monthly total mass balance for the last 10 years or so,” he
said.
