Manufacturers have become much more sophisticated in their knowledge and understanding of Airborne Molecular Contamination (AMC) and its effects in the cleanroom. They have a better general understanding of where AMC control should be applied and why, and as their knowledge of AMC-related problems have increased, so too have their expectations for an AMC control system.
In fact, some manufacturers’ concerns about the proper selection of a control system have become so acute that it is reflected in their control specifications. One manufacturer may call for a minimum of a 90% removal of target contaminants, while another will set AMC control limits at 1 ppb or less. Still another may require that the system must last a minimum of one year between filter changeouts. As strict as they may seem individually, there are manufacturers that require all three of the above criteria to be met.
Compounding the situation, some manufacturers insist on trying to find a “one filter fits all” solution for AMC control, demanding that a single filter should meet all of their control criteria for all contaminants of concern. However, chlorine requires one type of filter, ammonia another, and organic compounds still another. The type of filters/systems used for toxic gases would not be the same as odor control.
“Are you looking for high efficiency or long service life?” “Do you require absolute control of one contaminant or relative control of a group of contaminants?” These are only some of the questions that an AMC control system designer must consider, even though his customer may not understand the implications of not taking all of this into consideration.
From: “Chemical Filtration Strategies For The Control of Airborne Molecular Contamination, Part 3”
