Research & Development World

  • R&D World Home
  • Topics
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Biotech
    • Careers
    • Chemistry
    • Environment
    • Energy
    • Life Science
    • Material Science
    • R&D Management
    • Physics
  • Technology
    • 3D Printing
    • A.I./Robotics
    • Software
    • Battery Technology
    • Controlled Environments
      • Cleanrooms
      • Graphene
      • Lasers
      • Regulations/Standards
      • Sensors
    • Imaging
    • Nanotechnology
    • Scientific Computing
      • Big Data
      • HPC/Supercomputing
      • Informatics
      • Security
    • Semiconductors
  • R&D Market Pulse
  • R&D 100
    • 2025 R&D 100 Award Winners
    • 2025 Professional Award Winners
    • 2025 Special Recognition Winners
    • R&D 100 Awards Event
    • R&D 100 Submissions
    • Winner Archive
  • Resources
    • Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • Educational Assets
    • R&D Index
    • Subscribe
    • Video
    • Webinars
    • Content submission guidelines for R&D World
  • Global Funding Forecast
  • Top Labs
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE

Study raises questions about longstanding forensic identification technique

By R&D Editors | December 10, 2013

This x-ray image shows the cranial vault outline of a skull. Image: Ashley MaxwellForensic experts have long used the shape of a person’s skull to make positive identifications of human remains. But those findings may now be called into question, since a new study from North Carolina State Univ. shows that there is not enough variation in skull shapes to make a positive identification.

“In a lot of cases, murder victims or the victims of disasters are from lower socioeconomic backgrounds and don’t have extensive dental records we can use to make a match,” says Dr. Ann Ross, a forensic expert and prof. of anthropology at NC State who is senior author of a paper on the new study. “But those people may have been in car accidents or other incidents that led them to have their skulls x-rayed in emergency rooms or elsewhere. And those skull x-rays have often been used to make IDs. I’ve done it myself.

“But now we’ve tried to validate this technique, and our research shows that the shape of the skull isn’t enough to make a positive ID,” Ross says.

At issue is the “cranial vault outline,” not the “face” of the skull. The cranial vault outline is the profile of the skull when viewed from the side, running from just above the bridge of the nose to the point where the skull and neck meet.

For the study, the researchers surveyed 106 members of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences. Survey participants were asked to evaluate 14 antemortem x-rays and five postmortem x-rays. Participants were then asked to match the five postmortem x-rays with the appropriate antemortem x-ray, effectively establishing a positive ID.

But the researchers found that only 47% of the participants made accurate identifications on all five skulls. Participants who have graduate degrees did slightly better, with 56% of them getting all five correct.

“This doesn’t mean that cranial vault outlines aren’t useful,” says Ashley Maxwell, lead author of the paper and a former graduate student at NC State. “For example, outlines can be valuable if teeth or other features are missing or have been destroyed. But it does mean that cranial vault outlines shouldn’t be given too much weight.

“The more characteristics we can take into account, such as facial features and cranial vault outlines, the more accurate we can be,” Maxwell says.

The paper appears online in the Journal of Forensic Sciences.

Source: North Carolina State Univ.

Related Articles Read More >

JWST spots a 6-mile moon hiding in Uranus’ rings
DNA microscope offers new 3D view of organisms from the inside out
A tale of two industries: How manufacturing and medical imaging experts can learn from each other
Dark energy camera captures the glittering galaxies of the Antlia Cluster
rd newsletter
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, trends, and strategies in Research & Development.
RD 25 Power Index

R&D World Digital Issues

Fall 2025 issue

Browse the most current issue of R&D World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading R&D magazine today.

R&D 100 Awards
Research & Development World
  • Subscribe to R&D World Magazine
  • Sign up for R&D World’s newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing
  • Global Funding Forecast

Copyright © 2026 WTWH Media LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of WTWH Media
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search R&D World

  • R&D World Home
  • Topics
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Biotech
    • Careers
    • Chemistry
    • Environment
    • Energy
    • Life Science
    • Material Science
    • R&D Management
    • Physics
  • Technology
    • 3D Printing
    • A.I./Robotics
    • Software
    • Battery Technology
    • Controlled Environments
      • Cleanrooms
      • Graphene
      • Lasers
      • Regulations/Standards
      • Sensors
    • Imaging
    • Nanotechnology
    • Scientific Computing
      • Big Data
      • HPC/Supercomputing
      • Informatics
      • Security
    • Semiconductors
  • R&D Market Pulse
  • R&D 100
    • 2025 R&D 100 Award Winners
    • 2025 Professional Award Winners
    • 2025 Special Recognition Winners
    • R&D 100 Awards Event
    • R&D 100 Submissions
    • Winner Archive
  • Resources
    • Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • Educational Assets
    • R&D Index
    • Subscribe
    • Video
    • Webinars
    • Content submission guidelines for R&D World
  • Global Funding Forecast
  • Top Labs
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE