Researchers from the Centre for Quantum Technologies (CQT) at the National University of Singapore and the University of Seville in Spain have reported the most extreme ‘entanglement’ between pairs of photons ever seen in the lab. The result was published October 30, 2015, in Physical Review Letters.

The achievement is evidence for the validity of quantum physics and will bolster confidence in schemes for quantum cryptography and quantum computing designed to exploit this phenomenon.

“For some quantum technologies to work as we intend, we need to be confident that quantum physics is complete,” says Poh Hou Shun, who carried out the experiment at CQT. “Our new result increases that confidence,” he says. 

Local realism

Entanglement says that two particles, such as photons, can be married into a joint state. Once in such a state, either particle observed on its own appears to behave randomly. But if you measure both particles at once, you notice they are perfectly synchronized.

Albert Einstein was famously troubled by this prediction of quantum physics. He didn’t like the randomness that came with just one particle. He said “God does not play dice.” He didn’t like the correlations that came with two particles, either. He referred to this as “spooky action at a distance.”

Experiments since the 1970s have been collecting evidence that quantum predictions are correct. Recently an experiment in the Netherlands became the first to do away with all assumptions in the data-gathering.

Technically known as a ‘loophole-free Bell test,’ the experiment leaves no wiggle room in meaning: entangled particles do behave randomly, and they synchronize without exchanging signals. (The results appeared in Nature on October 21, 2015, doi:10.1038/nature15759). 

Entangled to the max

In the lab in Singapore, Poh and his colleagues also performed a Bell test. But instead of closing loopholes, their setup pushes the entanglement towards its theoretical maximum.

They make entangled photons by shining a laser through a crystal. The photons interact with the crystal in such a way that occasionally, one splits into two and the pair emerges entangled. The team control the photons with an array of lenses, mirrors and other optical elements to optimize the effect.

The researchers looked at 33.2 million optimized photon pairs. Each pair was split up and the photons measured separately, then the correlation between the results quantified.

In such a Bell test, the strength of the correlation says whether or not the photons were entangled. The measures involved are complex, but can be reduced to a simple number. Any value bigger than 2 is evidence for quantum effects at work. But there is also an upper limit. 

Quantum physics predicts the correlation measure cannot get any bigger than 2sqrt(2) ~2.82843. In the experiment at CQT, they measure 2.82759 ± 0.00051 – within 0.03 percent of the limit. If the peak value were the top of Everest, this would be only 2.6 meters below the summit.

No extensions

The record result also rules out a proposed extension to quantum theory. Earlier this year, Alexei Grinbaum with CEA in France put forward a model in which quantum physics is just an effective description of a more fundamental theory. He calculated a new limit on the correlation measure using tools from information theory. The calculations considered how much information an observer can hold about a two-particle system, and gave a limit on the correlation measure sitting just 0.1 percent under the quantum limit.

“You need a very precise measurement to be able to distinguish the quantum limit, and that was our achievement,” says Christian Kurtsiefer, a Principal Investigator at CQT and co-author on the paper. The team’s result exceeds the Grinbaum limit by enough to rule out the model behind it.

Entanglement doesn’t allow faster-than-light communication, but it can be used for secret messaging and to speed up some calculations. Checking that it’s possible to reach the quantum limit for correlations is valuable for these applications: their security and reliability depends on this limit being fundamental.

Citation: “Approaching Tsirelson’s bound in a photon pair experiment” Hou Shun Poh et al, Physical Review Letters 115, 180408 (2015). https://journals.aps.org/prl/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevLett.115.180408