Research & Development World

  • R&D World Home
  • Topics
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Biotech
    • Careers
    • Chemistry
    • Environment
    • Energy
    • Life Science
    • Material Science
    • R&D Management
    • Physics
  • Technology
    • 3D Printing
    • A.I./Robotics
    • Software
    • Battery Technology
    • Controlled Environments
      • Cleanrooms
      • Graphene
      • Lasers
      • Regulations/Standards
      • Sensors
    • Imaging
    • Nanotechnology
    • Scientific Computing
      • Big Data
      • HPC/Supercomputing
      • Informatics
      • Security
    • Semiconductors
  • R&D Market Pulse
  • R&D 100
    • 2026 R&D 100 Award Winners
    • 2026 Professional Award Winners
    • 2026 Special Recognition Winners
    • R&D 100 Awards Event
    • R&D 100 Submissions
    • Winner Archive
  • Resources
    • Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • Educational Assets
    • Subscribe
    • Video
    • Webinars
    • PharmSci360
    • Content submission guidelines for R&D World
  • Global Funding Forecast
  • Top Labs
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE

Starship’s first orbital flight tests key pieces of SpaceX’s million-satellite data center plan 

By Julia Rock-Torcivia | October 7, 2026

On Sept. 28, SpaceX’s Starship spacecraft reached orbit for the first time during its 14th test flight, after 13 earlier flights on deliberately suborbital trajectories, and deployed 26 Starlink V3 satellites.

Flight 14 demonstrated satellite delivery and initial communications. The computing payloads, sustained heat rejection, economics and operation at the proposed constellation’s scale remain to be demonstrated.

While none of the satellites deployed on that launch are part of the million-satellite orbital data center SpaceX is planning, the flight tested several things that plan depends on.

On Jan. 30, SpaceX filed an application with the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) asking it to approve a plan for one million satellites orbiting at 500 to 2,000 km. The company said that satellites for the data center plan will rely heavily on the technology that the V3s use, including solar arrays and thermal-management systems.

The company estimates that launching a million metric tons of satellites a year could add 100 gigawatts of power capacity for AI computing annually, assuming 100 kilowatts per metric ton.

What Flight 14 demonstrated and what it didn’t

Flight 14 demonstrated Starship’s first orbit insertion, first real payload deployed to orbit and first deorbit burn. But not everything went according to plan.

The booster lost one engine on ascent, then relit 31 of 33 engines for its boostback burn, the burn that turns the booster back toward its landing zone, and 11 of 13 for its landing burn. SpaceX said it designed the boostback to burn through the booster’s remaining liquid oxygen to test its performance limits. On the ship, a Raptor vacuum engine shut down early during ascent, and SpaceX shortened the mission as a precaution. The ship still completed orbital insertion, satellite deployment and its deorbit burn.

Across three flights with Raptor 3 engines, every one has had anomalies, and booster landing relights have been a recurring problem.

The 26 satellites deployed during Flight 14 are the first V3s in orbit. SpaceX says they will go through checkout and raise their orbits before serving customers, but gave no timeline for when the satellites might be active. The company reported contact with all 26 V3s over laser links, ground stations and user terminals. As of Oct. 1, the 26 satellites had not yet appeared in the public U.S. Space Force satellite catalog.

While Flight 14 won’t tell us anything about the data center satellites themselves, including how they will burn up on reentry, which the FCC has questioned, and if their large solar arrays and radiators will make them brighter, a concern astronomers raised, it did demonstrate some important capabilities like deployment from Starship and communication over inter-satellite laser links.

While the public comment period on SpaceX’s FCC application ended in March, the FCC still hasn’t ruled. The application received about 1,500 public comments and a petition from Amazon Leo, Amazon’s satellite broadband network, to dismiss the application without prejudice on the grounds that it is incomplete. In a May 29 letter answering FCC questions about disposal and casualty risk, SpaceX said it designs its satellites so that no surviving component would strike Earth’s surface with more than 15 joules of kinetic energy. Based on its own modeling, SpaceX considers the casualty risk zero. The application language, as reproduced in Amazon’s petition, also allowed operators to instead demonstrate a casualty risk below 1 in 10,000.

Tell Us What You Think! Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Related Articles Read More >

Under oath, Google confirms three AI agent test escapes as OpenAI, Anthropic and Meta face NYC lawmakers
What AI-assisted engineering taught us about team design 
Big tech turns to debt to fund the AI buildout 
Google’s overdue Gemini 4 Argon reaches the frontier with mixed results for science
rd newsletter
EXPAND YOUR KNOWLEDGE AND STAY CONNECTED
Get the latest info on technologies, trends, and strategies in Research & Development.

R&D World Digital Issues

Fall 2025 issue

Browse the most current issue of R&D World and back issues in an easy to use high quality format. Clip, share and download with the leading R&D magazine today.

R&D 100 Awards
Research & Development World
  • Subscribe to R&D World Magazine
  • Sign up for R&D World’s newsletter
  • Contact Us
  • About Us
  • Drug Discovery & Development
  • Pharmaceutical Processing
  • Global Funding Forecast

Copyright © 2026 Arrowfly LLC. All Rights Reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Arrowfly
Privacy Policy | Advertising | About Us

Search R&D World

  • R&D World Home
  • Topics
    • Aerospace
    • Automotive
    • Biotech
    • Careers
    • Chemistry
    • Environment
    • Energy
    • Life Science
    • Material Science
    • R&D Management
    • Physics
  • Technology
    • 3D Printing
    • A.I./Robotics
    • Software
    • Battery Technology
    • Controlled Environments
      • Cleanrooms
      • Graphene
      • Lasers
      • Regulations/Standards
      • Sensors
    • Imaging
    • Nanotechnology
    • Scientific Computing
      • Big Data
      • HPC/Supercomputing
      • Informatics
      • Security
    • Semiconductors
  • R&D Market Pulse
  • R&D 100
    • 2026 R&D 100 Award Winners
    • 2026 Professional Award Winners
    • 2026 Special Recognition Winners
    • R&D 100 Awards Event
    • R&D 100 Submissions
    • Winner Archive
  • Resources
    • Research Reports
    • Digital Issues
    • Educational Assets
    • Subscribe
    • Video
    • Webinars
    • PharmSci360
    • Content submission guidelines for R&D World
  • Global Funding Forecast
  • Top Labs
  • Advertise
  • SUBSCRIBE