
[Adobe Stock]
1. AI gets hybrid: Smarts and speed in one package
Ever since researchers reported that large language models’ performance seemed to improve if you asked them to reason and for a sort of chain of thought, reasoning has become a quickly growing trend in the space. The WSJ noted that OpenAI embraced the model, in part, out of frustration in trying to train a successor to GPT-4 and getting underwhelming results. Now, on the heels of releasing its o3-mini series, OpenAI is teasing the eventual launch of GPT-5, which can reason when it needs to but without thinking long and hard about easy questions. Meanwhile, The Information reports that Anthropic’s forthcoming model will have a “sliding scale” for computational resources, allowing users to dynamically adjust reasoning intensity as needed. While reasoning models trained with reinforcement learning are considerably better at coding and STEM tasks, they are also more resource intensive. By offering users granular control over computational trade-offs, as seen in Anthropic’s approach, or by seamlessly embedding reasoning within broader systems, as OpenAI proposes, these hybrid models are poised to broaden AI accessibility and accelerate its integration across a wider spectrum of applications.
2. Distillation’s dilemma: AI firms tightrope walk between openness and moats
Another potential touchpoint with the emergence of hybrid models is that it potentially indicates that AI companies will keep powerful internal AI models to themselves. That is, given the risk of competitors or researchers distilling knowledge from their most powerful models into new AI systems, frontier AI companies are forced to walk a tightrope between the allure of open model dissemination and the imperative to construct defensible competitive “moats,” which seem to be hard to defend in any event. To be sure, distillation allows for the rapid and economical replication of sophisticated reasoning capabilities, as the Stanford/UW s1 model trained for under $50 just showed. OpenAI’s accusations against DeepSeek regarding alleged data harvesting for R1 distillation and that company’s subsequent decision to curtail the standalone release of o3 paints a picture of growing anxieties over intellectual property protection and the potential erosion of competitive advantages.
3. Code shock? AI’s developer (and broader knowledge work) disruption could be looming
Speaking of reasoning models, the rapid ascent of AI’s coding capabilities is generating a “Code Shock” throughout the software development landscape, simultaneously raising alarms about workforce disruption and escalating security vulnerabilities. Predictions from industry leaders like Sam Altman and Mark Zuckerberg suggest an accelerating displacement of human developers in core coding tasks. OpenAI CEO recently said that its first reasoning model with the millionth best coder in the model. The full-fledged o3 was equivalent to the 175th competitive programmer in the model and that it now has a model that is equivalent to 50th and it could hit number one by year’s end. “We don’t see any signs of [this scaling] stopping,” Altman said. To date, however, the rise of AI code has been something of a mixed blessing. A study by Stanford University found that approximately 40% of code suggestions from GitHub Copilot had security issues.

[DeepSeek]
4. DeepSeek didn’t dent the dollar drain: AI scaling still a $100B game
Despite the emergence of more cost-efficient AI models like DeepSeek’s resource-light R1 model and the Stanford s1 model trained for under $50, the AI landscape remains fundamentally defined by “Billion-Dollar AI. Massive” infrastructure investments are common. See the proposed $500 billion StarGate data center initiative or the projected $300+ billion in 2025 capex from tech giants like Amazon, Microsoft, Meta, and Alphabet. Just this week, Elon Musk offered an unsolicited $97.4 billion bid for OpenAI while early reports suggest that his firm, xAI, will soon launch Grok 3, a model trained on 100,000 NVIDIA H100 GPUs. This training setup used about ten times more computational power than its predecessor, Grok 2. Physicist Yann Le Du estimated on X that operating 100,000 H100 GPUs for a month would consume about 181 trillion joules of energy, equivalent to roughly 7% of a typical nuclear reactor’s monthly output.
5. AI escapes from the screen

[Wikipedia]
6. AI model scaling at any cost — despite gripes from safety experts
Even as more voices warn that AI scaling is potentially poised to accelerate beyond the ability of humans to control it, an AI arms race is underfoot. Just this week, Vice President JD Vance criticized EU-led safety frameworks as “authoritarian censorship” at the Paris AI Summit. His remarks align with the Trump administration’s push for rapid AI development, prioritizing market dominance over multilateral safeguards. This “permissionless innovation” stance has emboldened tech firms to accelerate model scaling despite warnings from researchers. In addition, Google has apparently recently revised its AI ethics policy, removing explicit commitments against developing AI for weapons and surveillance while maintaining broader safety principles. Meanwhile, OpenAI, which itself is increasing the frequency of new product launches, has experienced a significant exodus of safety-focused employees. The departures began with high-profile resignations, including co-founder Ilya Sutskever and superalignment co-lead Jan Leike, followed by a string of other workers focused on AI safety.